
The Design Office of the Action Committee MEETING 1/2026
AGENDA
The Venue: La Rivelaine Estate : https://larivelaine.be/en/la-rivelaine/home-en/, situated in Lillois-Witterzee, part of the municipality of Braine l’Alleud in the Belgian Province of Walloon Brabant, near Waterloo, at some 25 minutes driving from Brussels and some 45 minutes with the train from Brussels South. The Estate is directly accessible from the Railway Station of Lillois and offers ample possibility for parking.
Arrivals as from 9h15. Welcome Coffee & Thee between 9.00h CET and 10h00.
10h00- 10h25
Opening. Words of Welcome and introduction by Domenec Ruiz Devesa and Klaus Welle
Presentation of the concept of the Design Office by Lieven Taillie
10h15-10h45
Introductory Speech by Herman van Rompuy with Food for Thoughts.
11h-12h45
First Round of Discussions, introduced by Klaus Welle, Martens Centre and Christophe Leclercq, Europe Media Lab, moderated by Domenec Ruiz Devesa, president of UEF.
“Giving a concrete significance to Art 42.7 and the paths towards European strategic capacities” (provisional title)
“Resilience of the Information System”
13h-13h45
Lunch
13h45-14h15
Guided Tour in La Rivelaine Incense factory
14h30-16h15
Second Round of Discussions, introduced by Prof. Ronnie Belmans (KULeuven) and Koen De Leus, chief economist of BNP Paribas Fortis, moderated by Lieven Taillie (AEJ Belgium)
“A resilient electricity system as the kernel of a reliable and resilient industry, communication and society”
“Why working at a Saving and Investment Union and building a secure Europe is a logical binom?”
16h15-16h30
Conclusions by Monica Frassoni, former VP of the EP, member of the TAC
Practical Info: number of participants , coming from different professional and cultural backgrounds, limited to 24, car pooling from Brussels South back and forth to La Rivelaine in Lillois
REPORT
IN SMALL CONFIGURATION WG DEFENSE, ENERGY SECURITY & DIPLOMACY
TRUST AS A BASIS FOR AUTHORITY RELEVANCE, STRUCTURES, STARTING BLOCKS, PREDICTABILITY, CREDIBILITY WORKING AT PREDICTABLE FAIR PARTNERSHIPS
“The question is not whether Europe needs unity, as it clearly does. The question is how to make it operational” We picked this significant quote up from a study published by the Brussels Institute for Geopolitics (BIG) entitled ‘Green Realpolitik: Recasting Europe’s Climate and Energy Diplomacy’, written by Professor Thijs Van de Graaf from Ghent University, back in July 2025.
Another quote from this same study is: “ Deep decarbonization at home remains essential, but for different reasons, not because it will save the planet, but because it underpins Europe’s credibility abroad.” This reminds us of the fact how crucial credible branding is in political, cultural and economical diplomacy, having in mind that not only the individual but also the collective responds to a famous quote to be found in a novel of 1962 by Kurt Vonnegut, ‘Mother Night’, saying ”We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be!” How to deal with this important issue of perception and in what way the Draghi, Letta and Niinisto reports are showing the way?
As mentioned in previous TAC Documents focus in this first working year of the design office(DO) remains on questions of civil and military preparedness in support of the choice of the TAC for this field of action, whereby we discuss it in the DO from a multitude of angels, transversally, in line with the approach followed during the 3 Houjarray Foresight Talks in the Maison Jean Monnet in previous years.
As Ms Muriel Delaporte from the Defense Magazine Operationnels SLDS rightly points in her article “From Algorithms to Kilowatts” published in the margin of the Eurosatory Fair in June 2025 in Villepinte (Paris), “Energy is rightly described as operational by many armed forces. It has become a decisive factor on the battlefield, inseparable from the logistics component. The battles of tomorrow will therefore be won not only with algorithms, but also-and always-with kilowatts”. We may add, as the ongoing war in Ukraine clearly shows, these battles are fought on many fronts and not only at the geographical frontline.
It all points to the inherent paradox of the technological turn our contemporary societies are taking, offering them manifold possibilities for operational superiority but also new vectors of several vulnerabilities.
In what way AI applications are affecting everything we are doing through the integration of existing applications?
As is reminded in the 2025 Houjarray Declaration rebuilding trust requires strengthening our communication and education systems, certainly in times we are confronted by what some experts qualify as cognitive warfare. What began and is still presented as essentially an augmentation helping humans to take better and faster decisions, becomes bit by bit a dependency because of managerial decisions looking often too exclusively to easiness and financial gains at the expense of human labour and so atrophies human expertise. Where do we invest in AI so that it is for good? Where and how do we obtain the necessary means?
Is the Rearm Europe initiative up to its promise to mobilise substantial national and EU-level resources to scale up defence investment across the Union? What about its financial underpinnings: are they fit for purpose and coherent enough? Should we look at a reframing of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to repurpose it to also support public investment in defense?
More than enough questions are here on the plate. Looking at them through different experienced glasses is what we want to do.
With the activities of the TAC and its design office we want to build further upon what was central in both Monnet’s and Kohnstamm’s approach: organizing peace by organizing trust. We invite you to take part in this exercise to look more closely into operational vulnerabilities, logistical strains, environmental and social pressures and the challenges they purport for European autonomy, sovereignty and the need for frugality.