On this July 17, World Day for International Justice, the Union of European Federalists (UEF) reaffirms its support to the International Criminal Court (ICC), a unique jurisdiction in the world, which embodies one of the major achievements of international justice, promoting international law and victim’s redress.  

We strongly condemn the Trump Administration's ongoing interference and unjustified sanctions against ICC judges and prosecutors and in particular the recent statement by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announcing that Washington will work to “systematically disable” and “dismantle the ICC, brick by brick, if necessary.”   

In fact, Marco Rubio accused the Court of “waging a war against our country, not with bullets or missiles, but with the force of so-called international law,” and described it as an institution “backed and run by a powerful network of leftist nongovernmental organizations, smug globalists, and hostile Third World governments.” The State Department confirmed the campaign will expand sanctions, visa revocations, and travel bans against ICC judges, prosecutors, and affiliated organizations, while pressing allied governments, including EU Member States, to reject the Court’s jurisdiction or risk losing U.S. security cooperation. This marks a sharp escalation from targeted sanctions to an explicit, government-wide effort to incapacitate the Court altogether. 

The Union of European Federalists recalls that the European Union has been among the strongest supporters of the ICC and its mandate. The ICC exemplifies the belief that some crimes (genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, the crime of aggression) are so grave that they concern the whole of humanity.  

In this context, we view the Trump administration actions as an unacceptable attack on international justice. The extraterritorial enforcement of these measures within the European Union is a clear violation of our legal and political sovereignty. It attempts to compel EU-based entities to participate in a blockade against an international judicial body that the Union itself is bound by treaty to support. The EU Blocking Statute was designed precisely for this scenario in 1996: to protect European operators from the unlawful application of foreign legislation. 

The demand to shield the ICC is rooted in the clear, established mandate of the European Parliament. Throughout 2025 and into 2026, the Parliament has exerted intense and sustained pressure with several urgent Parliamentary questions on the European Commission to deploy this legal shield, echoing the demands of Member States like Slovenia, civil society organizations, and the ICC itself.  In particular in its Resolution 2025/2528 adopted on  12 March 2025 the European Parliament expressed its “utmost concern about US sanctions against ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff, which constitute a serious attack on the international justice system” and called upon “the Commission to urgently activate the Blocking Statute and on Member States to urgently increase their diplomatic efforts in order to protect and safeguard the ICC and the indispensable cornerstone of the international justice system”.  

However, despite these clear directives, and despite public statements by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa defending the ICC's independence from Washington's pressures, the executive is actively ignoring the repeated, explicit calls of the European Parliament.  

Domènec Ruiz Devesa, president of UEF and MEP 2019-2024 stated that: “The EU should react by protecting ICC, defending international Justice and stopping Donald Trump and his allies' dream of a world governed by impunity and arms”.  

The UEF is committed to promote International Justice, fight impunity and protect victims of human rights crimes.  We firmly support the mobilization led by Eumans and No Peace Without Justice (NPWJ) and the campaign of the Coalitions for ICC and call for the immediate activation of the EU Blocking Statute to protect the ICC.   

READ THE UEF STATEMENT ON THE EU BLOCKING STATUTE AND THE DEFENSE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

PRESS CONTACT

Mathilde Baudouin, Secretary General of the UEF

secreatiat@federalists.eu

Brussels, 13 July 2026

The Union of European Federalists (UEF) welcomes the non-paper presented by the Government of Spain on the creation of a European Sovereign Facility (ESF). This is a bold and pragmatic proposal that can contribute to developing a European safe asset through common debt issuance, while preserving fiscal obligations and avoiding any increase in overall public debt.

The Spanish non-paper proposes a "European Sovereign Facility" through which the European Commission would centralize part of participating countries' annual borrowing—covering around a third of their debt redemptions plus deficit needs—by issuing common EU bonds and passing the money back as loans, all without creating any new debt, since it just reorganizes financing that would exist anyway. Participation would be voluntary and conditional on following EU fiscal rules, and the goal is to build a much bigger, more liquid pool of EU debt (up to roughly €850 billion a year) so it becomes attractive enough to global investors to lower borrowing costs for everyone involved, backed by a double guarantee (the loan itself plus the EU budget) that shields non-participating countries if someone defaults. In the event of a default by a participating country, losses borne by the EU budget will be recovered from EU payments to that member state. Only if these were insufficient would other participating states cover losses, while non-participants would be shielded and would hold a claim on the defaulting member state.

Such an initiative would complement the EU bonds issued by the Commission to finance SURE, Next Generation EU, and the loan to Ukraine.

The proposal is consistent with the resolution adopted by the UEF European Congress in Barcelona in March 2026, which called for a new generation of European joint borrowing, a gradual transition towards a European safe asset, and the possibility for a coalition of willing Member States to move forward when unanimity proves impossible to do it at 27. At a moment when global investors are increasingly seeking alternatives to traditional reserve assets, in particular the US dollar, Europe has a historic opportunity to lower borrowing costs for several Member States, strengthen the international role of the euro by providing a sizable quantity of a Euro-denominated asset, and enhance its economic and geopolitical influence.

Domènec Ruiz Devesa, president of UEF and MEP 2019-2024 stated that: “A genuine window of opportunity exists today for the euro to strengthen its global role. The international monetary system is evolving, but Europe is failing to seize this moment because too many governments remain trapped in short-sighted national calculations. A European safe asset is not merely a financial instrument. It is a strategic tool to strengthen Europe's sovereignty, reinforce the international role of the euro, reduce financial fragmentation and increase the European Union’s capacity to project power and defend its interests globally. In a world of continental powers, monetary sovereignty and geopolitical influence go hand in hand.”

Spain has put forward a serious and innovative proposal that should ideally develop within the EU framework. Other Member States, starting with France and Italy, two of the largest economies of the euro area and among the main beneficiaries of a deeper and more liquid European sovereign debt market, should now join in transforming this initiative into a concrete political project, beyond the financial benefits for individual Member States, that could catalyze in the medium term the creation of an EU permanent borrowing capacity focused on financing clearly defined European public goods (like defense, energy, measures agains climate change) and strategic investments where Europe can deliver more effectively and efficiently than European member states.

Such a permanent borrowing capacity must be necessarily accompanied by European forms of taxation approved by the European Parliament. This could also foster deeper political integration while maintaining fiscal obligations ensuring financial stability in Europe, triggering the necessary steps to further reform the governance and institutions in Europe to make them fit-for-purpose and ensure that funds are spent efficiently/effectively and in total more fiscal space won, in the spirit of the reports of Mario Draghi and Enrico Letta. Such steps would represent a decisive advance towards a stronger Economic, Monetary, and fiscal Union and, ultimately, towards a more sovereign and federal Europe.

For media enquiries, please contact:

• UEF Secretariat, secretariat@federalists.eu

Brussels, 24 June 2026

The Union of European Federalists (UEF) welcomes the decision of the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions (PETI) to declare open Petition No. 0456/2025 on the Reform of the Treaty of Lisbon, following a public hearing held yestarday, on 23 June 2026.

The petition was presented before the Committee by UEF President Domènec Ruiz Devesa and Secretary General Mathilde Baudouin, in the presence of the UEF Vice-President Daphne Gogou. The PETI Committee's decision to keep the petition open represents a significant step forward in the campaign Treaty Reform Now! and reinforces the UEF's call for a federal, democratic and sovereign Europe capable of acting decisively on the global stage.

During the hearing, the petition received the explicit support of eight Members of the European Parliament spanning multiple political groups: MEPs Andrea Wechsler (EPP), Brando Benifei (S&D), Raquel García Hermida-Van der Walle (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Nikolas Farantouris (The Left), Vasile Dîncu (S&D), Juan Fernando López Aguilar (S&D), and Thijs Reuten (S&D). Their cross-partisan backing demonstrates growing parliamentary consensus around the urgent need for institutional reform.

Speaking before the Committee, UEF President Ruiz Devesa stressed the existential urgency of the moment: "The EU faces an increasingly unstable world. The decision-making processes, often conditioned by vetoes, paralyze our ability to respond to crises. This is unacceptable." Secretary General Baudouin underlined the democratic dimension of the petition: "The European Parliament is the only institution directly elected by European citizens, and its proposals must not be ignored."

The petition urges the PETI Committee to keep the matter open as a priority, to request an implementation report from the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) to track progress on Treaty reform, and to address institutional reform in the context of the MFF negotiations and the 2027 budget, using Parliament's budgetary powers to press the Council into action.

The UEF recalls that the European Parliament has already twice reaffirmed its commitment to Treaty change since the petition was submitted in April 2025 — through resolutions adopted in October and November 2025 — while the European Council has continued to ignore Parliament's calls to open a Convention under Article 48 TEU.

"Citizens across Europe are calling for a stronger, united Europe capable of defending democracy, providing security, and acting with one voice," said Ruiz Devesa. "Today's hearing shows that an increasing number of MEPs are willing      to stand with them, and that the European Commission is ready to move forward. The European Council must no longer delay."

PRESS CONTACT

Mathilde Baudouin, Secretary General of the UEF

secreatiat@federalists.eu

Please find the attachments below

• Decision on the Petition 
• Other documents on the Petition

This Press release has been relaunched

1. La Unión de Federalistas Europeos obtiene un avance importante para la reforma del Tratado de Lisboa - El Triangle

Here the trascript of the Interventions
Domènec Ruiz Devesa "Thank you very much, chair. Also to all the members of the petty committee and uh to the coordinators that alongside with with you the chair have uh supported the hearing on our petition. uh dear Cheronskam and also of course uh many thanks as well to some of the MEPs uh that are present in the room to support us like uh Andrea Vexler, Brando Benif and uh Rael Garcia Reander Val on behalf of our organization I would like um to express our position on this topic.

This petition is a call to action in a moment of existential urgency for the European Union. The EU faces an increasingly unstable world. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia, the conflict in the Middle East, and the emergence of an axis between a democratic and illiberal regimes have exposed the fragility of our union. This underscores the need for a strong stronger and united Europe capable of speaking with one voice. particularly in foreign affairs, security and defense and therefore able to act decisively. The reports by Leta Drago and Drai and Ninisto made it clear. We are currently unable to provide for our own security and to maintain our competitiveness on the glo on the global stage. This failure risk undermining the very achievements that define the European social model. including the rule of law, the rule of law and the safeguarding of fundamental rights.

The root of this problem lies in the eur eur in the current European Union's inability to act uni united particularly regarding the unanimity rule in a number of uh important policy fields as mentioned foreign policy security and defense but not only. The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the 22nd of November of 2023 which was a critical step toward addressing this issue. by proposing amendments to the treaty of Lisbon in accordance to the reform procedure foreseen in the treaty itself article 48. However, more than two and a half years later, the European Council has yet to uh reply to this proposal by the European Parliament, which in our view this constitutes a violation of the reform procedure of article 48, but also a violation of the principle of loyer loyal and sincere cooperation between EU institutions.

Therefore, we uh consider that this is a matter of particular interest to the European Parliament who proposed this reform. It is also a question of course of defense of the prerogatives of the European Parliament. And in the end, I'd like to conclude my part before giving the floor to my colleague, the secretary general of the UEF, Matilda Bod Bada, that it is not acceptable that member states appear to fear more um losing the capacity to block a common decision than the the world of dangers that we live in, including Mr. Putin. Thank you."

Mathilde Baudouin: "The European Parliament is the only institution directly elected by its citizens, the European citizens, and its proposals that are actually in continuity with the demands from the Conference on the Future of Europe must not be ignored. This is not simply a procedural issue. In recent months, citizens have increasingly voiced their support for a stronger united Europe, for even a common European defense, as reflected in all the latest Euro barometer surveys. They have repeatedly called for an end of the veto, demanding a union that can act decisively and democratically. We are facing a crisis of both democracy and accountability. If the EU is to defend democracy globally, it must show the example at home.

Since we submitted our petition in April 2025, the parliament has reaffirmed its commitment to treaty change and called again the European Council to act, namely through two very important moment. First, the resolution adopted on October 22, 2025 on the institutional consequences of EU enlargement negotiations which reiterates the call to open a convention under article 48 of the treaty of the European Union. Second, the resolution adopted on November 25, 2025 on the institutional aspects of the draggy report, which urges the European Council to respond to the Parliament's request and ask both the commission and the European Council to outline precise steps towards reform.

We care deeply about the European project and its citizens, and we know you do as well. Therefore, we respectfully ask this committee to first keep the petition open and ensure it remains a priority. Second, ask the president messah to send a formal letter to the European Council. Third, request an implementation report in the constitutional affairs committee to track progress. And finally, to address this matter in the context of the MFF negotiations and the 2027 budget using the parliament power of the purse to pressure the European Council into action. The EU finally needs to listen to its citizens and to take the bold steps that are needed to secure its future. Thank you."

European Commission representative during the hearing: "All right there chair honorable members um dear Mr. Devesa I can be very short um the or very brief the parliament's resolution from 22nd of November 2023 with proposals for treaty change activated the treaty revision procedure in article 48 of the treaty on European Union on 18th of December 2023 the council sent the parliament's proposals to the European Council and informed the national parliaments in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 48, paragraph 2 of the treaty. In line with the treaty, it's for the European Council to decide on the next steps. The commission stands ready to fully play its institutional role in the procedure as set out in article 48 of the treaty and in particular to give its opinion if and when consulted by the European Council. Many thanks."

MEP Andrea Wechsler (EPP): "Thank you very much chair. I would like to thank the petitioner Mr. Domènec Ruiz Devesa as well as his Secretary General Mathilde Baudouin and the Union of European Federalists for bringing this very important institutional question before our committee. The petition addresses a matter of clear relevance for the European Parliament. The follow-up to Parliament's resolution on the 22nd of November 2023 on the amendment of the treaties and the responsibilities of the Parliament and the European Council under Article 48.

Parliament has exercised its prerogatives. The European Council is therefore expected to examine Parliament's proposal and to engage substantively with a revision process. This is not only a political expectation but also a question of sincere cooperation and respect for the institutional balance of the Union. From the EP side, we share the view that the Council's response has so far not been sufficient. The European Parliament should continue to insist that its proposals are treated seriously and that there is clarity on the way forward. For today, the right signal is clear. We should not close this file. We should keep the petition open, maintain public dialogue with the petitioners and ensure that this issue remains on the agenda in our dialogue with the Council. Thank you."

MEP Raquel García Hermida-Van der Walle (Renew Europe): "Thank you, sir chair, you said it very well. Thanks, thanks a lot. Thank you to the petitioners. It is a great pleasure and an honor to listen to your presentation today and also to see a lot of members of the Spinelli Group. For those of you who might not know us, we are the people fighting for a federal Europe here in the European Parliament. But we're mostly, and that's what brings us to the subject of today, the people fighting for a Europe which is able to defend its sovereignty. It's the people fighting for Europe which is able to defend our people. It is the ones fighting for Europe which really can face the challenges of the 21st century and the geopolitical situation.

So I think this petition is very timely and I think the Commission and of course the member states should reply in a suitable manner, in an adequate manner to the demands of this European Parliament from 2023 to open up the treaties to reform to ensure that our treaties are fit for purpose, that they can take us into the future and they don't stop us from achieving the goals that we are trying to achieve with each other. Um, I think it's extremely important that this petition remains open. I would like to support that call and I would also like to make a call to all colleagues in the European Parliament to ensure that we are able and willing to use the biggest power that we have in this house which is the power of the budget. So again, thank you so much to the petitioners, to the organizers of this action and again, all encouragement to keep it open for the time being. Thank you."

MEP Nikolas Farantouris (S&D) "Thank you very much. I would like to say I support the need to revise the treaties. I would also support the fact that the bodies within the European institutions have to be consistent. What I mean by that is that they themselves should have taken initiatives after the decision from the European Parliament. But unfortunately we've had silence from them. So I would just like to join my voice to those other colleagues who are a more federalist in approach to have a complete completion of the EU. Thank you."

MEP Gabriele Bischoff (S&D): "Thank you very much Mr. President. And I would also like to thank the petitioners for this initiative. And I would like to highlight again that—and I was one of the different rapporteurs of the report on treaty changes—that we based this long work of all pro-European democratic political groups on the work of 800 randomly selected citizens who came up with proposals. So it is very much based, developed from the ground then up to this house and therefore it is very important also indeed to keep this petition open and ongoing.

But I think also we could do a little bit more. So I would like to propose and ask you as chair of this honorable committee to also take up this petition, also to write a letter, for example, to the Council President, and also emphasizing again how important it is for this house, how important it is for the petitioners that we keep this road not only open but that we go down, especially to have a Europe that is capable to act for its citizens. Thank you very much."

Brando Benifei (S&D) "Thank you, chair. First of all, congratulations to Domènec Ruiz Devesa and the Union of European Federalists for their commitment in keeping the debate on the reform of the treaties alive through this petition and all this effort that I think is extremely timely. At the moment of unprecedented geopolitical challenges, Europe will either be federal or it will not be at all. Europeans through this parliament have already spoken following the Conference on the Future of Europe. In 2022 and 2023, we adopted resolutions calling for a convention and for treaty change. Today, those who advocate for European disintegration, certain political parties say that the parliament's position on the treaty reform belong only to a previous and different legislature. I want to clarify this because this is factually wrong. The AFCO report on the institutional aspects of the Draghi report which I followed as rapporteur and which was adopted by large majority of this parliament in November 2025 recognize the simple reality: Europe cannot achieve its objectives on innovation, decarbonization and defense without targeted treaty reform. So in a different legislature again the same political message from this parliament.

So the question now is what follow-up we need to give. So in my view we must continue the effort launched by parliament to open a convention and advance the treaty revision process under Article 48 of the Treaty of the European Union. This means reminding the European Council of its responsibilities under the treaties including through a new plenary resolution calling for meaningful follow-up to Parliament's proposals. Then parliament should be prepared to use its budgetary powers to ensure that its treaty reform initiative is taken seriously and not ignored. We should also bring this debate to national parliaments across the union, encouraging member states to discuss parliament's proposals and place treaty reform back on the agenda of the European Council. Finally, if the deadlock persists, we should not exclude pursuing legal action before the Court of Justice. So let me conclude in the line of what I just said that this petition should remain open until such time as the European Council has substantively addressed the parliament's proposal and announced the procedural path forward to finally deal with these very important issues. Thank you very much."

MEP Juan Fernando López Aguilar: "Well, first of all, I always when it comes to the petitions committee, I always thank the petitioners because they are exerting a fundamental right on their own to begin with. It's a fundamental right enshrined in the charter and in the treaty of functioning of the European Union to begin with. Second, as to the substance, if we follow the Euro barometer parameters, we can only conclude that most of European citizens clearly favor stronger, more united, more capable EU. We honestly of course question about the equipment of our institutions as they are by now in order to deliver their stronger more united more capable European Union. So time again it comes to unanimity in the council paralyzing EU action allowing national vetos to block common solutions weakening the union's credibility outside and within precisely when union unity matters most and that challenge can only grow with enlargement. That's absolutely clear. strengthening a union politically, economically and geopolitically meaning meaning that we need to reinforce the the the EU capacity to deliver in an stable world bringing about our commitment to peace and prosperity. The European Parliament has done it part of the job. We actually we actually set in in motion an initiative to bring about and trigger the process of treaty revision. We did it in the past mandate of the European Parliament 2023 and yet state of engaging with parliament's proposal the council has chosen silence so far European asking stronger Europe and the council in silence treaty reform is not an option it's indispensable so I can only conclude that we need for that reason first to keep this petition alive deserving better attention on its merits, welcoming the opportunity to discuss it today with the European federalists. But having said this, I only stress also the importance of fully involving the constitutional affairs committee, which is the one in charge of treaty revision, ensuring that it is invited to deliver an opinion on the matter. So I support the petition. I welcome the European Federalists to calling for attention on the matter. I remind that we have actually activated a treaty reform on the side of the European Parliament expecting for a response for the council stating that silence should not be an option and I ask for the involvement of the constitutional affairs committee ensuring that is invited to deliver an opinion. Thank you."

The intervention by petitioner Domènec Ruiz Devesa: "Thank you very much uh dear chair. Once again, many thanks to all the MEPs uh that have participated in the petition in the hearing and that have uh provided uh support to keep it open. Um also thanks to as I said before to the coordinators to Sandra Gomez particular that tabled the the petition to the coordinators to the proposal. Maybe just uh very quick uh observations of course also regarding the the last MEP's comments the the the majority of the legislation in the EU is already adopted in the in the procedure by qualified majority voting. So it's not that we have thankfully right to veto on everything already. So we're just proposing to use a democratic procedure in all policies. Uh uh and then maybe one remark also for the the commission um that I slightly disagree when the commission said if and when the European Council ask for the consultation because there is no if in the article 48. So in any case it's when but not if uh and then of course the commission has to provide uh its opinion as it is established in as it is established in article 48. I agree with uh what has been said uh that uh the parliament has several tools to move this file forward including the power of the budget including going to the court of justice uh acting uh with a report from uh the AFCO committee and indeed the this is a very crucial point and with this I end that by definition the petition has to remain open until there is a reply from the European Council. Thank you very much and I also allow it's okay like that."

Promotion on Instagram social media

Brussels, 23 June 2026

European security is under threat, together with the world order, as shown by four years of Russian aggression on Ukraine. However, progress on European defence is very insufficient, both at the industrial and political dimensions, which in fact are closely connected. The collapse of the Franco-German-Spanish Future Combat Air System (FCAS) is a very illustrative case in point of a political gap masked by industrial failure, due to the disagreements between privately owned Dassault and the semi-state-owned Airbus, over control of the programme and workshare, access to sensitive technology, and ownership of the intellectual property developed during the project.

The collapse of FCAS pushed German and Spanish companies to propose a new “Team Gen 6”, outlining plans to pursue a next-generation fighter architecture outside the original SCAF framework. All of this, while the alternative Global Combat Air Program (GCAP) by Italy, UK and Japan is going ahead. We risk having three competing projects, where we need just one.

However, the industrial deadlock between Dassault and Airbus was not merely a commercial dispute over workshare and intellectual property, but the expression of different national political preferences and defence postures: France's doctrine of full military self-sufficiency - encompassing not only independent nuclear deterrence, but also carrier aviation, and sovereign control over its entire defence industrial base - clashed with Germany's different operational requirements and its preference to operate with allied systems. Ultimately, the governments proved either unwilling or unable to impose a compromise on the companies - unwilling, because the positions each company defended largely reflected what their respective governments considered non-negotiable national interests, and unable, because forcing a concession would have meant overriding those very interests.

In other words, this case shows once again, very clearly, that neither industrial companies nor national governments to which they are linked, can lead on military integration. A greater role for the European Commission and the European Defence Agency operating within the framework of a Common European Defence System, and stricter requirements to access EU funding is needed to go towards joint procurement and the reduction of the European weapons system. The fact that the 27 Member states have around 130 types of major land, air and naval weapon systems and the US around 30, is a key reason why we spend 30% of the US with a 10% capacity, thus wasting most of our expenditures ineffectively. The EU should incentivise the merging of these projects to create one European sixth generation fighter jet.

To reach strategic autonomy Member states must accept to go beyond voluntary industrial cooperation toward limited but real centralised procurement authority for major defence systems, alongside clearer allocation of industrial leadership based on capability rather than political return. Successful EU defence procurement is in the end dependent on setting up a European Common Defence. A European multinational force, starting with the Rapid Deployment Capacity, to whom to allocate EU-funded defence equipment is thus a crucial step.

Such an EU supranational authority must define what we need, and thus the technical specificities of the future weapon system, and the open procurement to procedures, instead of national enterprises that reflect private interests or narrow national interests. 

While national defence expenditures are increasing, joint procurement is stuck at 20 per cent. However, the new Security Action for Europe (SAFE) threshold for joint procurement is even lower than the European Defence Industry Reinforcement through Common Procurement Act (EDIRPA) ones. If SAFE 150 billion € were used to strengthen EDIRPA, the European Defence Fund and the European Defence Agency to finance joint programs (for example to merge the Anglo-Japanese Global Combat Air Programme and the FCAS), this would allow significant progress. But SAFE only finances national military expenditures, which continue to benefit mainly US enterprises, with US weapons exports to Europe doubling between 2021 and 2024.

An EU defence is essential to gain deterrence capacity and ensure the EU security, spending more efficiently and reducing US dependencies. This requires identifying our capability gaps – an exercise regularly done both within NATO and the EU – developing tools to fill them, starting with the strategic enablers, for which we depend massively on the US. The Joint Undertakings could be a tool for the Commission, Members states and private actors to cooperate in developing European satellite monitoring and communication systems, air defence, troop transport, and cyber-defence capacities.

The EU must rise to the challenge of the reduced US commitment to European security, amplified and accelerated by the current administration, but started much earlier. The NATO New Force Model, approved under Biden Presidency, foresees that in the case of an attack against a European NATO member, NATO should mobilise 300.000 troops in a month, all of them Europeans. Only at later stages US troops could eventually be mobilised. With a possible significant reduction of the US troops in Europe, the need to strengthen EU capacity for territorial defence is evident. Permanent Structured Cooperation on Defence (PESCO) could be used by willing Member states to upgrade the Rapid Deployment Capacity into an EU permanent multinational force – already agreed by the European Council in Helsinki in 1999 but never made fully operational – to communitarise existing bi-lateral and multinational military cooperation among Member states, like the Baltic Naval Squadron, the Franco-German Brigade, the Eurocorps, etc, and to develop a true EU command-and-control system, possibly linked to NATO. 

As Mario Draghi said in Aachen “external hardness requires internal depth”. Progress in common defence, a common industrial policy, and investments (which require resources), and federal political union, are closely interlinked. Achieving them requires the political will of at least some Member States to proceed in a unified manner across all these sectors. If steps are not taken along this path soon, citizens’ confidence in Europe’s ability to protect them will further erode, and nationalist forces will gain ground.

Domènec Ruiz Devesa, President of the UEF

Mathilde Baudouin, Secretary General of the UEF

Brussels-Madrid, 29 May 2026

The Union of European Federalists Spain (UEF España), the Union of European Federalists (UEF), and the Spanish Federal Council of the European Movement (CFEME) welcome the approval by the Spanish Congress of Deputies of a Resolution (Proposición No de Ley) calling on the Government of Spain to declare, with irrevocable character, Spain's membership of the European Union, and support for the federal reform of the Treaties.

On 28 May 2026, the Plenary of the Congress of Deputies approved Resolution 162/000767, ext negotiated across parliamentary groups, which instructs the Government of Spain to:

• Reaffirm and advance Spain's commitment to the European project as guarantor of democracy, the rule of law, human rights, security and economic stability;
• Declare with irrevocable character Spain's membership of the European Union;
• Support in the European Council the project for reform of the Treaties to strengthen European sovereignty and independence, endowing the Union with greater capacity to act in foreign policy, security, defence, energy, industry and the ecological, digital and social transitions, while guaranteeing social and territorial cohesion and the principle of subsidiarity;
• Promote the full development of the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights with regard to regions and peoples of the European Union;
• Work with fellow Member States towards the recognition of Basque, Galician and Catalan as official languages of the European Union.

The resolution was approved with the support of several parliamentary groups and marks the 40th anniversary of Spain's accession to the then European Communities, formalised on 12 June 1985.

A Milestone in Spain's European Vocation

UEF España, UEF and CFEME welcome this resolution as a significant political statement. Spain has consistently been one of the most pro-European societies in the Union, and this declaration consolidates that tradition at the highest level of democratic representation.

The resolution is also notable for its explicit endorsement of the reform of the EU Treaties proposed by the European Parliament in November 2023 — a proposal that has long formed part of the agenda advocated by European federalist organisations. Moving beyond unanimity rules and strengthening the Union's capacity to act in key policy areas is not a federalist aspiration alone: it is, as the resolution rightly states, a functional necessity for a Union that must remain credible and effective in an increasingly complex world.

The Role of Civil Society

Our organisations have long argued, through publications, public debate and engagement with political actors, that Spain's commitment to the European project should be stated clearly and durably — not as a mere political preference but as a foundational orientation of the Spanish state.

We are pleased that these debates have found their way into the legislative process, and we acknowledge with appreciation the initiative of the Socialist Parliamentary Group (GPS) and the other parliamentary groups that supported or contributed to the final text. This is, above all, a success of Spain's democratic institutions and of the broad pro-European consensus that underpins them.

Looking Ahead: From Parliamentary Resolution to Government Declaration

A parliamentary resolution is a powerful political signal. Its full potential, however, will be realised only when the Government of Spain acts upon it. We call on the Government to follow through on the mandate of the Congress by issuing a formal, solemn declaration of Spain's irrevocable commitment to the European Union — a step that, under the principles of international law governing unilateral declarations of States, would carry legal weight beyond the domestic political sphere.

We equally urge the Spanish Government to translate its support for Treaty reform into active, constructive engagement within the European Council, where this proposal has yet to receive the attention it deserves.

Quotes

Enrique Barón Crespo, President of the UEF España: "Forty years after accession, Spain is not merely a member of the European Union — it is one of its most committed builders. This resolution reflects that spirit and sends a clear message: Spain's place is in Europe, and that place is not up for debate."

Domenec Ruiz Devesa, President of the UEF: "We congratulate the Spanish Congress of Deputies for this forward-looking resolution. At a time when the European project needs friends who speak clearly, Spain has done so. We hope other national parliaments will follow this example in supporting the proposal to reform the Treaties"

Francisco Aldecoa , President of the CFEME: "The European Movement has worked for decades to make European integration irreversible not just in law but in the hearts and minds of citizens. This resolution is a step in that direction, and we encourage the Government to give it the fullest possible effect."

About the organisations

• UEF España (Unión de Europeístas y Federalistas de España) is the Spanish section of the Union of European Federalists, advocating for a democratic, federal and united Europe.
• UEF (Union of European Federalists) is a pan-European citizens' organisation with members across all EU Member States, working towards a federal Europe based on the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights.
• CFEME (Consejo Federal Español del Movimiento Europeo) is the Spanish national council of the European Movement International, the oldest pro-European civil society network in Europe.

For media enquiries, please contact:

• UEF Secretariat, secretariat@federalists.eu

The Dutch Renew  and D66 MEP Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle will take over the rotating presidency of the parliamentary intergroup.

Strasbourg, May 21, 2026

Dutch Renew Europe and D66 MEP Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle will take over the rotating presidency of the parliamentary intergroup. She was elected by acclamation on Monday 18th May by the Spinelli Group Board in Strasbourg.
The appointment was announced during the Public General Assembly “40 Years After Spinelli”, held at the European Parliament to honour the legacy of Altiero Spinelli and his vision for a federal Europe promoted by the UEF and European Movement France.

As Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle succeeds Gabriele Bischoff, S&D and SPD MEP and First Vice-President of Europa-Union Deutschland, in the rotating presidency of the Spinelli Group, the Union of European Federalists (UEF) expresses its full support for her leadership and its continued commitment to working closely with the Group in advancing the federalist cause.

The Spinelli Group and the Union of European Federalists warmly thank Gabriele Bischoff for her dedicated chairwomanship since July 2025 and her commitment to strengthening the federalist movement within the European Parliament.

“Serving as Chair of the Spinelli Group has been a profound honour. At a time when Europe faces existential geopolitical, democratic and social challenges, our responsibility has been to defend and strengthen the European project with courage and ambition.
As the first woman ever to chair the Spinelli Group, I am particularly proud to have contributed to broadening and strengthening our federalist coalition across political families and national borders. Europe’s future will only be secured through unity, democracy and a stronger capacity to act together.
The European moment is now. Europeans expect us to move beyond fragmentation and vetoes, and to build a Union capable of protecting its citizens, defending its values and shaping its own destiny.” Gabriele Bischoff said.

During Bischoff’s presidency, and in addition to regular Board meetings, the Spinelli Group organised several politically significant events dedicated to the future of European integration and institutional reforms.
These included:

• The high-level conference “For a Stronger, More Democratic and Inclusive European Union – Towards a European Federation” in November 2025 in the Hellenic Parliament in Athens, which brought together policymakers and civil society representatives to discuss democratic reform and the future architecture of the European Union.
• The initiative “Bring a European Federalist” reception at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, aimed at fostering dialogue between Members of the European Parliament and inviting them to join the Spinelli Group.
• The round table held during the UEF European Congress in Barcelona, entitled “Is Draghi’s Pragmatic Federalism enough to face current challenges?”
• The event in May 2026 in the European Parliament in Strasbourg celebrating 40 years after Altiero Spinelli’s passing.Under Bischoff’s leadership, the Spinelli Group also adopted and promoted an updated political manifesto, “The European Moment is Now”, calling, in a concrete and pragmatic proposal, for a more sovereign, democratic and federal European Union capable of acting decisively in an increasingly unstable global environment.

The new President, Raquel García Hermida declared after her appointment: “Forty years ago, Spain joined the European Union. Today, as a Spaniard who became a Dutch citizen and now serves as a Dutch Member of the European Parliament, I see my own story as part of the European story itself.
The European Union gave me the freedom to live, work, and participate politically across borders. That is the European dream: a Europe where everyone can benefit from freedom, opportunity, and shared citizenship.
But our freedoms, prosperity, and security cannot be taken for granted. I deeply believe that only a stronger and more federal Europe can protect future generations and preserve the values that define us.
We do not need the American dream. We have our own European dream. And in that dream is the future of civilization as we know it.”

The federalist movement is deeply grateful to have such dedicated individuals supporting its cause.
Thank you very much Gabriele, Good work Raquel!

Brussels, 13 April 2026 

The Union of European Federalists (UEF) warmly welcomes the outcome of the Hungarian parliamentary elections of 12 April 2026. We congratulate the winner and next Prime Minister Peter Magyar and the Hungarian people for their democratic engagement, for reaffirming their commitment to European values, the rule of law, and solidarity with the rest of the Union. 

The resounding defeat of Viktor Orbán constitutes an extremely positive and timely development not only for Hungary, but for Europe as a whole, and for Ukraine. At a moment when the European Union must demonstrate unity and resolve in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression and US threats against their commitment in the transatlantic Alliance, the prospect of constructive engagement from Budapest represents a significant step forward, after all these years of obstruction by Orbán and his violations of the principle on loyal and sincere cooperation, including sharing information and coordinating his actions with Putin. 

Therefore, the UEF urges the incoming Hungarian government to lift its predecessor's vetoes, and on the European institutions—most notably the Council—to act without delay, once the new Hungarian government takes office, to: 

• adopt the €90 billion financial assistance package for Ukraine, ensuring sustained macro-financial support and reconstruction capacity;  

• approve the 20th package of sanctions against Russia, reinforcing the Union’s economic and political pressure on the Kremlin.  

At the same time, the UEF stresses that the structural weaknesses of the Union’s decision-making system remain unchanged. The end of a single obstructionist government does not resolve the systemic risks associated with unanimity in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and other key areas. 

Therefore, the UEF identifies a window of opportunity between now and the French presidential elections of April 2027 to advance decisive institutional reforms. In particular, the European Council should: 

• agree to activate the passerelle clauses provided for in the Treaties to extend qualified majority voting in CFSP and budgetary and financial matters, among others, and if unanimity is lacking, proceed with enhanced cooperations.  

• agree to activate Article 42.2 TEU on establishing European Common Defence, and if unanimity is lacking, proceed under Permanent Structured Cooperation. 

• follow up on the European Parliament’s proposals for Treaty revision under Article 48 TEU.  

Europe must not rely on favourable political contingencies to function effectively. It must endow itself with the institutional tools necessary to act decisively, regardless of national political cycles. 

The UEF stands ready to support all efforts aimed at strengthening the Union’s unity, democratic legitimacy and capacity to act. 

Domènec Ruiz Devesa , President and MEP 2019-2024

Mathilde Baudouin , Secretary General 

Domènec Ruiz Devesa re-elected by acclamation as President of the Union of European Federalists.

Former Spanish Member of the European Parliament Domènec Ruiz Devesa has been re-elected by acclamation as President of the Union of European Federalists (UEF) during the XXIX European Congress held in Barcelona from 20 to 22 March 2026, co-organised with UEF Spain and UEF Catalunya Federalistes d’Esquerres. 

This re-election comes at a particularly symbolic moment, as 2026 marks the 80th anniversary of the organisation, founded in 1946 to promote the political unity of Europe. Ruiz Devesa is the first Spaniard to lead the UEF in its history.

A High-Level European and Institutional Congress

The opening session brought together prominent European, national, and local political figures, including the President of the Generalitat of Catalonia Salvador Illa, the Minister of Foreign Affairs José Manuel Albares, 

the Mayor of Barcelona Jaume Collboni, former EU High Representative and Commission Vice President Josep Borrell, Vice-President of the European Parliament Javier López, and former President of the European Parliament Enrique Barón Crespo. 

Notably, both President Illa and Minister Albares emphasised the importance of the federalist path as a response to today’s challenges, highlighting the role of a more integrated Europe in ensuring peace, social justice, and international stability. To watch the welcoming speeches, please find here below

Debating the Future of European Federalism

A key highlight of the Congress was the Spinelli Group debate titled “Is Draghi's Pragmatic Federalism enough to face current challenges?”, which gathered leading federalist figures such as Gabriele Bischoff, MEP and President of the Spinelli Group, former HR/VP Josep Borrell, and Guy Verhofstadt, former Prime Minister of Belgium, Former MEP and ex-officio Board Member of the Spinelli Group. The discussion underscored the need for a method to strengthen political ambition in European integration to address current geopolitical, economic, and security challenges. While the necessity of deeper integration is widely acknowledged, the focus must now shift to concrete actions to achieve it. 

Celebrating 80 Years of Federalism

The Congress also marked the 80th anniversary of the UEF with a cocktail reception featuring an art exhibition by Lorenzo Epis, symbolising the connection between culture, European citizenship, and the federalist project. 

Another important moment was the event bringing together former UEF Presidents—Jo Leinen, Mercedes Bresso, Andrew Duff, Elmar Brok, and Sandro Gozi—who reflected on the evolution of the European federalist movement. By acclamation, they all became Honorary Presidents. 

A Political Agenda for a More United Europe

Throughout the Congress, which continued over the weekend, delegates debated and adopted key political resolutions outlining an ambitious vision for the future of the European Union. Key priorities include:

• overcoming unanimity in key policy areas such as foreign affairs, defence, and taxation;
• advancing towards a credible and operational European Defence Union;
• developing a common fiscal capacity, including instruments such as eurobonds;
• promoting deeper integration through coherent enhanced cooperation;
• advancing Treaty reform and strengthening the role of European citizens.

New Leadership Elected

The Congress also elected the new statutory bodies of the UEF. Alongside President Ruiz Devesa, the following Vice-Presidents were elected: Daphne Gogou, Giulia Rossolillo, Markus Ferber MEP, and Alin Mituta former MEP 2019-2024. Antonio Argenziano was elected Treasurer. 

The Executive Bureau also includes Eszter Nagy, Liubba El Hadi Hamed, Roberto Castaldi, Simina Tulbure, Michael Montag, José Luis Salazar, Sebastian Camarero, and François Leray. The Secretary General Mathilde Baudouin is confirmed in her charge. 

A Mandate for European Political Union

Following his re-election, Domenec Ruiz Devesa stated: 
“Europe is at a moment where it must take a qualitative leap towards political union to ensure its security, prosperity, and global relevance.” 

He further stressed that European federalism “is no longer an option, but a practical necessity,” calling on European institutions and national governments to act with greater ambition. 

The UEF Secretariat

Brussels, 6 March 2026

As European Federalists we express our solidarity to the Iranian people and recall the urgent need for a common European foreign policy.

The Union of European Federalists strongly condemns the military escalation in the Middle East which took, in a few hours, a dramatic dimension involving 15 States. The use of force by the United States and Israel against Iran, and the subsequent retaliation by Iran against countries in the region, undermine international peace and security and constitute a clear violation of international law. The recent experience in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan has demonstrated that wars seeking to overthrow authoritarian regimes could not successfully install democratic regimes but instead proliferate chaos and dictatorships.

We recall that all States must respect their obligations under international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, which clearly prohibits “the threat of the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”

As European Federalists, we recall our support for democracy in Iran and we focus on standing with the Iranian people, and in particular women and youth, in their fight against authoritarianism. We condemn the regime’s violent suppression of protests over the past decades. We express our solidarity with the Iranian people, commending their courage and determination for freedom, liberty and the fight for a better future. We emphasize that Iranians deserve to live under a government that respects human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity.

We welcome the January 2026 EU decision to officially designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization, as requested by the European Parliament; a long overdue decision which puts an end to the impunity of the main actor of the Iranian regime.

We regret the absence of a strong common European Union position concerning the escalation in the Middle East, due to the division of the 27 Member States, which weakens the Union’s global role. We emphasize the direct impact of the current crisis on all Member States and the urgent need for a common European foreign policy.

We call the Union to be actively involved in initiatives aimed at an immediate cessation of hostilities and de-escalation. The risks of a wider regional conflict could have grave consequences on the proliferation of nuclear weapons, chronic economic instability and the forced displacement of people. We strongly encourage the European Union to actively participate in diplomatic initiatives looking for a peaceful settlement of the crisis in the Middle East, in full accordance with international law, including the UN Charter.

We call on all EU institutions and Member States to reject Trump’s trade threats against Spain and take the appropriate defensive measures in the event.

We finally reiterate the urgent need for a strong European common foreign policy and strategic autonomy, calling on European leaders to start the process of the necessary Treaty changes, towards a federation which will save our democratic way of life, peace and freedom while at the same time respecting European security and economic interests.

UEF STATEMENT ON FRENCH ADVANCED NUCLEAR DETERRENCE

President Emmanuel Macron’s proposal to extend France’s nuclear deterrence to European partners offers a significant political signal towards the establishment of a common European defence outside the NATO framework, even if it stops far short of creating a fully shared European nuclear force.  The French proposal is a response to the relaunch of Russian and Chinese nuclear forces but also to US ambiguous stance towards European security.

With this proposal, France has declared that the overall continental security affects its vital national interests and therefore offers to integrate the interests of other European partners in its strategic reflection, including common consultations on threats; joint work on intelligence and detection, air defence, and deep-strike capabilities; the possibility to participate in nuclear military exercises; and the deployment of nuclear-armed French air forces in other European countries to enhance forward deterrence.

In addition, while the French-German joint statement of 2 March states that advanced deterrence it is meant to strengthen the NATO nuclear mission, and the “systems of collective security” of both the Atlantic Alliance (article 5 of the Treaty of Washington) and of the EU (article 42.7 Treaty on the European Union), the proposal would create a second, independent, and NATO-consistent layer of European nuclear deterrence. Both France and Germany emphasize that this plan respects the Treaty on Non-Proliferation.

On the other hand, President Macron has ruled out any allied participation in planning, implementation or decision about the use of the French nuclear arsenal. It will remain strictly under national command and control, with the President of the Republic retaining sole authority over its use. In legal terms, the force de frappe remains entirely French.

Macron has also stressed that advance deterrence is not an explicit security guarantee. Any extension of deterrence would remain deliberately ambiguous, preserving the flexibility that is central to the current nuclear strategy. As a result, partner states would gain political assurance and strategic dialogue, but not a codified, legally binding nuclear guarantee.

These two limitations constitute the price that Europe as a whole is paying because of decades of missed opportunities to integrate and strengthen its defence cooperation while national governments did not address the issue of creating shared sovereignty in time by thoroughly reforming its institutions, despite the process undertaken in this regard by the Conference on the Future of Europe and the proposals drawn up in the European Parliament in recent years.

Even in the current intergovernmental framework, however, and with the noted restrictions, this major move will not only benefit France but potentially all EU Member States, by offering a second, European layer of nuclear deterrence.

Therefore, the Union of European Federalists welcomes that some EU member states already accepted the French proposal of advanced deterrence and calls on all the others to do so, with a view of integrating it in the Common Defence envisioned on article 42 of the Treaty of the European Union, through Permanent Structured Cooperation.  In this regard, the UEF recalls its policy proposal for a Common European Defense System published in March 2025, which supported already the “Europeanisation of French uclear capabilities with shared financing from willing EU member States”.

This can be the very first step towards pooling warheads and the establishment of a European multinational force comparable to NATO’s nuclear sharing arrangements, a common European nuclear budget, and share decision-making power, with an EU “nuclear button,” eventually with the transfer of operational control to the European Union.

UEF also calls all Member States and EU institutions to support our proposal on a common European defence, consisting of the national armies of the Member States and a 28th European Army, coordinated in a common structure, compatible with NATO and serving as its European Pillar.

For this purpose - since European security requires to move towards collective burden-sharing, from intelligence gathering to budget allocating, and therefore the democratic governance of this evolution - the answer lies in a parallel progressive federalization of matters of European interest, so that European citizens can decide their future and the means to reach for it, through their European Parliament and executive.

The UEF share also the French president's view that the ultimate goal is a world without nuclear arms. This is a goal that can only be fully achieved through a world federation, but a sovereign Europe could already contribute to bringing this goal closer by committing itself to building a cooperative world order based on shared rules, in which diplomacy and international law once again become the instruments for pursuing international political objectives.