II Supranational MFE Congress
You can read the documents regarding this Congress here: LINK
The document UEF-0108 concerns the Second Congress of the European Federalist Movement (MFE) - (the Eight of the UEF), held in Strasbourg from 29 to 31 January 1960, at the Maison de l’Europe / seat of the Council of Europe. It was a particularly important congress because it took place shortly after the transformation of the UEF into an effectively supranational movement, no longer merely a federation of national movements.
1. Political significance of the Congress
The Congress came at the end of the profound organizational restructuring launched in the preceding years. The report on MFE activities recalled that, following the statutory reform of June 1959, the Union Européenne des Fédéralistes had been transformed into a “véritable mouvement supranational” — a genuinely supranational movement — and had adopted the operational name Mouvement Fédéraliste Européen.
The new system was based on regional organizations, with administrative autonomy, while national structures essentially became coordinating bodies. Strasbourg 1960 can therefore be regarded as the first major political congress of the MFE under the new supranational structure. The file explicitly describes it as the first congress held according to the new formula, while retaining the historical numbering as the Eighth Congress. See especially PDF pp. 63–64.
The final press communiqué described the MFE as a “véritablement supranational” movement and stressed that the Congress intended to define how a European political authority, which did not yet exist, ought to act, even though its necessity was becoming increasingly evident. The official programme combined political reports, commission work, and statutory elections.
Why Strasbourg 1960 matters
The Strasbourg Congress marked a genuine change of phase. The organized federalist movement that had still been deeply divided over strategy at Luxembourg in 1956 now appeared in 1960 with an explicitly supranational structure and a much more clearly defined political line:
European federal state → European government → directly elected Constituent Assembly → autonomous mobilization of the European people → Congress of the European People and primary elections as instruments of political struggle.
It was therefore not merely a congress about “European integration.” It was a congress that attempted to formulate an alternative political programme to that of the nation-states, ranging from economics and foreign policy to decolonization and European democracy.
And the leadership elected there — Marc, Rifflet, Giacchero, Delmas, Gouzy, Bolis, Spinelli, Albertini, Garosci, Mouskhely, Houx, and others — provides a very clear picture of the generation then leading organized European federalism.
Proceedings of the Congress
Friday, 29 January
The official opening took place in the grand chamber of the Council of Europe under the chairmanship of Enzo Giacchero, then President of the MFE Central Committee.
Speakers included:
- Enzo Giacchero
- Lodovico Benvenuti, Secretary General of the Council of Europe
- Pierre Pflimlin, Mayor of Strasbourg.
During the afternoon, the Congress heard:
- the report on MFE activities by André Delmas, Secretary General;
- the financial report by Pierre Lucion;
- the report of the Control Commission;
- above all, the General Political Report by Raymond Rifflet, President of the Executive Bureau.
The political debate continued into the evening. PDF pp. 7–8.
Saturday, 30 January
The work then moved into commissions.
The Political Commission was divided into three subcommissions dealing with:
- international policy;
- the European Community;
- economic and social policy.
There was also an Organization Commission, led by André Delmas, with a specific subcommission devoted to youth organization.
The Congress therefore addressed not only federalist constitutional strategy, but also economics, international affairs, the European Communities, Africa and Algeria, Eastern Europe, and the internal organization of the movement. PDF p. 9.
Sunday, 31 January
The final day was devoted to:
- the report of the Credentials Commission;
- the political resolution;
- the organizational resolution;
- elections to the Central Committee;
- the Control Commission;
- the Disputes Commission.
The official proclamation of the election results was scheduled for 5:30 p.m. PDF p. 10.
The major political resolution
The General Political Resolution was adopted by:
471 mandates in favour and 9 against.
The final text begins at approximately PDF p. 95.
The resolution opened with a very strong criticism of the existing European situation. The Congress:
- deplored the fact that governments and parliaments still conceived Europe mainly in terms of intergovernmental cooperation;
- denounced the revival of nationalism, including under the formula of an “Europe of Fatherlands”;
- recognized the importance of integration among the Six, while judging the methods followed to be insufficient;
- argued that Europe required a federal government subject to democratic control.
The document therefore went beyond a call for increased cooperation: it advocated an actual transfer and transformation of sovereignty.
Economic and social policy
The MFE supported a European policy based on:
- economic expansion;
- full employment;
- social progress;
- European coordination of economic policy;
- overcoming purely national economic policies.
The aim was to transfer to European federal institutions those powers of direction and regulation that national states were increasingly unable to exercise effectively.
International policy
The resolution explicitly criticized a number of national policies, including those of:
- Britain;
- France;
- Germany;
- Italy;
- Belgium;
- the Netherlands.
The central argument was that none of the European states, acting alone, was any longer capable of pursuing a genuinely independent world policy.
A European federal government, by contrast, would automatically constitute a major power capable of participating as a protagonist in:
- international negotiations;
- security questions;
- disarmament;
- scientific research;
- technological competition;
- policy toward Eastern Europe.
Africa and decolonization
The Congress regarded Africa’s advance toward independence as a “très grand événement” — a very great event — but feared the proliferation of small nationalisms.
The federalist answer proposed was twofold:
European federation + large African federations, linked by relations of cooperation and equality, replacing former colonial structures.
A specific motion on Algeria was also approved after a rather intense confrontation between differing positions.
Constitutional strategy
Here the continuity with Spinelli and with the strategy of the Congress of the European People is particularly clear.
The Congress:
reaffirmed the struggle for the convening of a European Constituent Assembly directly and freely elected by the European people.
The Constitution of the United States of Europe would then have to be submitted to democratic ratification by the peoples concerned.
The Congress also recognized the Congress of the European People (CPE) and its European primary elections as among the most effective instruments for building an autonomous popular base for federalism.
The Central Committee was therefore instructed to develop particularly close cooperation with the CPE.
This is one of the features that clearly distinguished the MFE of this period from simple institutional Europeanism: the aim was not merely to influence national governments, but to create an autonomous European political force capable of challenging the political monopoly of the nation-states.
Those elected at the Strasbourg Congress
The file also preserves the official document entitled “Election des organes directeurs du M.F.E.”, on PDF pp. 156–157.
The electoral figures were:
548 registered mandates
544 votes cast
9 invalid ballots
535 valid votes
Central Committee — elected by the Congress
| Elected member | Votes |
|---|---|
| Alexandre Marc | 517 |
| Raymond Rifflet | 514 |
| Enzo Giacchero | 512 |
| André Delmas | 509 |
| Jean-Pierre Gouzy | 504 |
| L. M. De Bernardis | 500 |
| Luciano Bolis | 499 |
| G. B. von Hartmann | 497 |
| Claus Schoendube | 489 |
| Arrigo Olivetti | 484 |
| Michel Derouet | 476 |
| Altiero Spinelli | 462 |
| Canon Orban | 441 |
| Michel Mouskhely | 423 |
| Raoul Lammers | 420 |
| Mario Albertini | 419 |
| Winfried Krause | 397 |
| Gabriel Badarau | 378 |
| P. J. G. Houx | 373 |
| André Darteil | 369 |
| Germain Desboeuf | 355 |
| Georges Goriely | 355 |
| Dragas Keseljevic | 329 |
| Aldo Garosci | 325 |
The ranking is politically interesting: Marc, Rifflet, Giacchero, and Delmas occupied the first four places, while Spinelli ranked twelfth with 462 votes. Mario Albertini also entered the Central Committee with 419 votes.
Candidates not elected
The document also records the votes received by the remaining candidates:
- Steidler — 279
- von Schenck — 277
- Magnant — 190
- Montanari — 182
- Bertaux — 181
- Dollfus — 142
- Salmon — 105
- Wilhelm — 104
- Donner — 91
- Mlle Josephy — 75
- Mme Decamps — 58
- Mme Le Maresquier — 19
- Peschard — 19.
6. Central Committee members designated by national delegations
The statutes provided that the members elected directly by the Congress would be joined by additional members designated by national or territorial delegations.
The document lists:
Belgium
- Pierre Lucion
- Jean Verheyen
France
- Alfred Biedermann
- Christian Brunet
- Dominique Magnant
- Roger Sibille
Italy
- Giulio Cesoni
- Andrea Chiti-Batelli
- Guido Comessatti
- Gianni Merlini
Europa-Union Switzerland
As an associated organization:
- Jeanne Hersch
- Thomas Raeber
It is therefore important to distinguish between the 24 members elected directly by the Congress and the members later designated by the national or territorial delegations.
7. Control Commission
Those elected were:
| Elected member | Votes |
|---|---|
| Pierre Lochak | 520 |
| Guido Bachi | 520 |
| Marcel Deton | 520 |
| Jean Richard | 519 |
| Albert Golschield | 517 |
PDF p. 157.
8. Disputes Commission
Those elected were:
| Elected member | Votes |
|---|---|
| Léonce Deprez | 517 |
| Paul-Émile Brogniez | 517 |
| Edwin Kolender | 517 |
| Marlise Roquette | 517 |
| D. R. Peretti-Griva | 517 |